Writing of your essay starts with a pre-writing process whereby the article writer identifies appropriate invention approaches for his/her essay. This involves evaluation of technology techniques in order to use those that convey the aim of the essay to targeted audience. An excellent essay must have good flow of ideas that are well coordinated to keep carefully the audience reading. It is important to peer review and critique an article from an alternative article writer as this enables one to critique his/her first draft of article and make necessary corrections during article revision. This personal reflective article addresses challenges encountered while writing an article and reflectively proposes answers to such challenges.
Self Reflective Essay
In writing my essay, the pre- writing strategies that I used were brainstorming, cubing and classical invention. Brainstorming empowered me to break up a block in my thinking and come up with the right ideas related to essay topic. I started by recording every association about the subject to be able to gain focus by subordinating the set of what I had written into parts that would form the article. This led me to cubing technique, which helped me to organize my thoughts and gain point of view that would most likely produce right ideas concerning article topic. In my program for cubing approach, I attempted to describe, compare, affiliate, analyze and claim for and from the essay subject. I merged cubing approach with classical technology strategy to ensure that I give detailed explanations in my essay definitions, comparisons, romantic relationships, circumstances and testimonies. Combining these three strategies for my prewriting effectively made certain that the essay resolved all relevant regions of essay subject matter because that which was not yet determined using brainstorming strategy was addressed by cubing and traditional invention techniques, which have provisions for more detailed information. I recognized that applying different pre-writing techniques is the main element to good article because one technique provides for what is absent in the other one. For example, using brainstorming strategy alone gave me many ideas on the subject, which I prepared using Cubin and classical invention techniques. These techniques demonstrated effective and I’d consider using them for my next article.
My purpose for writing this article was to persuade the audience that point has come for teachers to change from traditional school room teaching and learning methods to disruptive innovative teaching strategies outside class room that will be more exciting to learners and educators. My audience for the essay was learners and teachers. I wanted the audience to learn that students who happen to be various areas of the globe develop better public skills, are less rigid. They are more accommodative, have better problem resolving skills and finish up being better decision creators than the ones who do not. I needed the audience to comprehend that learning should not be confined within classrooms but it should be innovative enough to build learners reasoning, public and cognitive skills. I needed to completely capture the interest of the audience and get them into thinking about international travel learning and international conferences as disruptive impressive multicultural learning techniques that could provide learners with firsthand experience on different cultures. I wanted to go the audience into thinking of their next international travel learning vacation spot by the time they may be through with reading the article.
In previewing my peers essay, I appeared for main ideas conveyed in the essay, clearness of the ideas and the way the ideas have been indicated and coordinated to move and capture the attention of the targeted audience. I also viewed how convincing and useful my peers ideas were to the targeted audience. I found that essays that are not well organized lack stream of information being conveyed and discourage the audience from reading further. I found out the fantastic need to arrange an essay and draw out move of ideas right from introduction to finish in order to ascertain a direct interconnection between the article and the audience. This captures interest of the audience and motivates those to continue reading. I therefore noticed that I will apply the same approach as applied in my own peer analyzed article and improve on my articles quality of ideas.
In revising my essay, I started out by revisiting my purpose for writing this article in order to get a clear picture of the concept that I needed to mention to my audience. I then started out reading my article when i critiqued it with an aim of establishing areas of improvement. I realized that my ideas had a need to flow smoothly in one idea to another. The main revision engaged linking up ideas to make my article flow and keep the audiences interest captured throughout their reading. I modified the article to ensure that it meets its objectives in conveying required message to audience and also to set up a strong connection between my targeted audience and ideas being conveyed as this might make the audience to believe along my approach. The revised draft was much much better than the initial draft, with an outstanding movement of ideas. I learned that revising an article is important because it eliminates grammatical errors and brings about coordinated circulation of ideas that keep carefully the audience motivated to continue reading.
The strongest facet of my essay was the clear convincing ideas that supported my essay goal and retained the audience determined to read. Furthermore, there is an excellent circulation of ideas in my own essay that were well coordinated to help make the audience evaluate themselves in my school of thought as conveyed by the essay. The weakest aspect of my article was getting suggestions to flow as most of my ideas were initially confusing. However, this was addressed through revision of the essay. The writing troubles that we frequently ran into while writing this essay was getting the right words to make clear ideas and get the attention of audience. To handle this obstacle, I composed one sentence at a time and read it to see if it evidently conveys required meaning before going to another sentence. This is however time consuming although it gave my essay the right words and coordination to capture the attention of audience. For the next assignment I prefer to get started on by reviewing a peer article before I embark on mine as critiquing the peer article will make me write a much better essay.