FEBE1000A Essay Assignment Essay
Share: Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest
Free Essay
Nov 19th, 2019

FEBE1000A Essay Assignment Essay

Tpowerful of Contents

Introduction 4


Culture implications4


Career precious upshots 5

Late minute 5

Gender unevenness6 Argue for identity6

Conclusion 7

References 8

The under-representation of women in the engineering calling.

“Science is not a boy’s sport, it’s not a miss’s sport. It’s bountifulone’s sport. It’s encircling where we are and where we’re going” – Nichols. There is this infamy that engineering is a hardy calling due to the strain of hardy engineers. Factors such as refinement, patriarchy, misogyny, piety and toxic masculinity are other rules of the after a whiledrawal of women in engineering.

According to the Oxford English glossary engineering is the bough of comprehension and technology ununconstrained after a while the artifice, fabric, and use of engines, machines, and structures. As far as this restrictedation is uneasy, engineering is not trusting on gender but the abilities of an special. It is confusing why women are so marginalized when it comes to this upshot. In command to substantiate gender identity in the engineering calling, we must smash the under-representation of women in this calling.

This yarn allure be auspicious in orationing the upshots that women aspect in the engineering succession and how we can encounter this upshot.

It is an indubiconsultation occurrence that men and women were not created the selfselfselfsame way but in South African proper refinements and traditions continue these estrangements. For stance, men are dedicated cars and aeroplanes to emassemblage after a while and misss are dedicated dolls and kitchen sets (Ngozi, 2014). It constitutes it altogether perplexing for the miss child to get in a scope of systems and machines consequently this is triton exotic to her. Girls are taught from race that their fix is in the kitchen and nowhere else future the after a whiledrawal of women in the engineering sector. This in one’s object can be seen as a gendered upbringing, which is a infamy created by parents when we face at it at proudest apex. Refinement faces at women and their conceiveing abilities at a bigoted apex of object which media that it does not receive its era to conceive what women can do in this hardy-dominated scope. One could object such action by all refinements as “refinement guiltlessness” which is when a special uses refinement as a way to caress their iniquity love for stance refined that women must be acquiescent to men.

“Women are repressed, bygone and ruined by bountiful piety in the universe. They are reputed subject to men by these organizations and are for-this-argue condemned to be a second-arrange mark of special”. In frequent marks of pietys, women are seen as objects that were created to answer men. Christian Bible: Paul to the Ephesians in the New Testament ” The women shall be servants to their men who are their masters”. Women are then compelled to marry old leaders of the meeting-house and to get into polygamy. As a development, the men, chiefly through their devout beliefs, dishearten and rigorously aloft the utilization of an infinite whole of genius and abilities after a whilein women. Abilities to do exceptionally in STEM scopes and this how pietys further under-representation of women in the engineering calling.

There are frequent arguments that penetratetain been rich outside the occurrence that most men agencyle intimidated by auspicious women or a dame that is aloft their arrange, which is why frequent women are not dedicated issue positions or it is expensive to confront women in eminent positions when it comes to regulative the engineering succession. It is altogether inspirational to see women in successs that were said to be for men solely. Law, engineering and recitaling are seen to be successs for men and women can normal be teachers and housewives. Our environments are very expressive in determining the skin of fellow-creatures we allure be. School teachers chiefly math and physics teachers from my own experiment would be allureing to acceleration the boy child than the miss child. Such mans demotivate misss consequently to them they are seen as unfitted to do these analytical subjects.

The engineering scope has frequently pellucid dominated by men. This proud strain of men in this toil is an upshot for the adolescent misss that are spirited in befitting engineers. The completion is that they do not penetratetain or recognize any women in the engineering scope that they allure face up to, as their role models. Due to this after a whiledrawal of fehardy role models, they became dishearten to prosecute their dreams of embarking in entireman connected to engineering. It is solely now in the 21st date that we actually see women in this hardy-dominated toil. Due to concepts such as patriarchy, a dame’s fix has frequently been in the kitchen rather than out there launched and creating engineering models. Due to the occurrence that women are penetrateing this toil, prospects of augmentation must too extension. The toil does not constitute it unconstrained for women to penetrate it generally.

Most parents subscribe to the fewer estimate of misss that do engineering as their success by not foundationed their adolescent misss that penetratetain a crave to grace engineers, this is a gender stereomark that uniform our parents do. They price that engineering is for men and it implicates launched in unprotected environments that claim masculinity, For stance, mining engineering. Parents undervalue the abilities of their adolescent misss to enact selfselfsame as boys in the STEM scopes. That is the argue why the success paths of most misss are separated for by their parents and allure usually be triton love nursing, eatable, training, collective effort and so on. Parents surrender gender inequiconsultation advice to their consequence, the direction that is orationed to a adolescent man is contrariant from the one that allure be dedicated to a adolescent damely.

An engineer designated Priyanka Dhopade argues that the completion is not solely that there are few women in this sector but that there are bigger completions that are very separate than these bigoted arguments encircling women which is why fellow-creatures penetratetain to face at this in a separate way. She argues that the scope too has to implicate contrariant members of the association such as contrariant ethnic groups and the contrariant economic arrangees in the association. She goes on to say that teachers and parents must be taught encircling this scope in command to ignoring on the recognizeledge encircling it in command to constitute misss spirited and to extension the estimate of misss in the scope. she too argues that the environment must be tempting for if they are spirited. This engineer argues that role models are there but they are not unprotected ample or their effort is not unprotected ample (Briggs, 2018). Such arguments from fitted fehardy engineers acceleration see the deep completions and not the deportment.

Many women engineers release their jobs consequently of self-containedness and men standing towards them. In the toil that is bountiful of hardys, damelys launched after a while them are subjected to frequent perplexingies such as having to be unexceptionpowerful in bountiful way. When a man constitutes a misreceive it is bygone, but when the selfselfselfsame misreceive is made a dame it graces a big dispense. Most leaders in the engineering toil are hardys, and they are the origin of distant disparities among men and women in a way that women are victims of these crimeful treatments. These leaders are so unmerciful that they allure ready for sex in command for a fehardy efforter to get a elevation, triton that does not occur to hardy efforters uniform though they selfselfsame deanswer a elevation. In 2013 the Engineering Congress of South Africa (ECSA) “said almost 11% of the completion estimate of engineers registered after a while the congress were women, but that callingal women engineers completionled solely 4%”. Women end up leaving their occupations in the engineering toil consequently of the gender-bias that they experiment and This recital for the inferior estimate of damelys in this toil.

On one unembodied root there are arguments that the is a colossal turnbalance of women from men and that researchers penetratetain made a estimate of media to oration this and face at this colossal gap and that a colossal mile has to be receiven to indeed conceive this colossal estrangement (Frehill, 2010). There is a system that is created to face at the argues why women and men concession this scope named the system of effort combination (Davis and Lofquist, 1984). The underlying occurrenceors involve penniless launched provisions, the colossal estrangement in payments, the too abundantly demanding job and obscure to redress effort and successionage. Secondly the occurrence that some claimments are not met and lastly the occurrence that the is after a whiledrawal of confession at effort. This is in succession after a while the occurrence that the solutions are broader than what we see or what is put on the consultation.

This inidentity in the engineering toil must be spiritless down. Factors such as patriarchy, gender-stereotypes, gender-bias etc scarcity to be eliminated. Adolescent women must be encouraged in frequent ways to go for STEM scopes, chiefly engineering. One man that can be executed is to put up billboards and advertisements on collective media of women in fabric sites wearing choose helmets. This could prompt frequent adolescent misss gone they are empty of pink colours. Taking fehardy consequence to effort could be a excellent trudge that parents can receive to foundation their consequence as promptly as they see that they are spirited in befitting engineers. Removing gender eminence begins in our familial structures, there shouldn’t be chores that are meant for a restricted gender. For stance, painting, washing dishes, fixing spiritless appliances, sadness the lawn etc. This furthers inidentity and we should contend for identity. Generally, they are two marks of identity in South Africa namely ceremonious identity and material. Ceremonious identity is when bountifulone is treated selfselfsame after a whileout recognising any estrangements when-in-fact material identity recognises the estrangements among fellow-creatures and caters for them in a way that is correspondent for all but the aloft does not use any of the marks of correspondentities that one has set out.

In misrecord, this yarn was powerful to surrender an leading using a pertinent plead to the stuff at agency and it too set out a roadmap to what was going to be argueed in the assemblage. The yarn went on to argue how childhood has a eminence among what a miss should do and what the boy should do. The yarn too argueed cultural guiltlessness. Then the yarn went on to face at other sectors that exist so engineering. The yarn went on to face at the completions that origin this colossal estrangement in the scope. The yarn went on to foundation its arguments after a while regard to the statistics. The yarn too faceed at the contrariant marks of identity that exist in South Africa. The yarn too faceed at the arguments that were made by fitted fehardy engineers in the scope as to what is crime and what should be executed to encounter these completions. The yarn too faceed at the system that was created to conceive the completions at agency. Then lastly the yarn went on face at all the devout arguments at agency after a while regard to the bible as courteous.


Nichols, M. (2017). 13 Empowering Quotes From Famous Women in STEM. [online] GineersNow. Availpowerful at: [Accessed 8 Mar. 2019].

Ceci, S. and Williams, W. (2011). Understanding prevalent origins of women’s underrepresentation in comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, [online] 108(8), pp.3157-3162. Availpowerful at: [Accessed 13 Mar. 2019].

Clutter, C. (2010). The possessions of parental rule on their consequence’s success preciouss. [online] Hays, pp.28-30. Availpowerful at: [Accessed 16 Mar. 2019].

Dhopade, P. (2018). Women into Engineering: An interobject after a while Priyanka Dhopade. Cogent Engineering, [online] 5(1), pp.1-6. Availpowerful at: [Accessed 16 Mar. 2019].

Quinones, S. (2017). Gender Identity in STEM: Empowering women through issue and engineering education strategies. STEM Gender Identity Congress Proceedings, 1(1), pp.751-784.

Fouad, N., Chang, W., Wan, M. and Singh, R. (2019). Women’s Reasons for Leaving the Engineering Field. [online] Availpowerful at: [Accessed 18 Mar. 2019].

Thompson, M. (2019). Women engineers release balance men’s standings. [online] The M&G Online. Availpowerful at: [Accessed 18 Mar. 2019].

Rey, R. (1997). Abuse of Women by Religions. [online] Availpowerful at: [Accessed 16 Mar. 2019].

Recommended stories