Topic: Behavior is an observable action of human beings and nonhuman animals
‘Hug’ as an interactive behavior
A hug is perceived as a kind of physical intimacy. Many people believe that hugging is a ways of exchanging passionate feelings between each two people. People hug at night and at times in extensive daylight. Hugging in the 21st century can be regarded as a gesture of goodness or understanding. People engage in numerous kinds of hugs. For instance, intimate hugs, hailing hugs and friendly hugs are among the normal types of hug. A hug can portray many things depending on framework, culture and romantic relationship in which it can be used. The word can be used to depict companionship, love, brotherhood, sympathy and affection (Fairhurst et. al, 2014). Individuals who are sexually active have a tendency to use the gesture to portray their love for one another as hugging is a form of romantic gesture employed by couples. This report explores the annals of hugging and ways to learn as well as continue with the culture (Fairhurst et. al, 2014).
The expression ‘hug’ is perceived to have surfaced from two ideas. The first theory perpetuates that the word ‘hug’ comes from the Old Nurse vocabulary ‘hugga’. Hugga in this framework meant comfort. The next theory says that the word ‘hug’ comes from a German expression ‘hugjan’ this means to thought or having something in mind. Several researchers associate the origin of the term to the German expression ‘hegen’ which means to ‘enjoy’. The word was first found in the entire year 1610 in a community that applied wrestling culture to refer to a form of tight grasp on the opponent’s waistline. It had been later found in the 1650s to a gesture of ‘affectionate embrace’. Hug was used to consolidate comfort (Cohen et. al, 2015). The word Hug was found in the semantic terminology to make reference to ‘mental response’. The gesture was found in ancient battles showing the adversary that the war could not start without fighting with each other weapons. The gesture of hugging can be from the early ideology of individual civilizations. Relating to Rossano, hugging was a ritual behavior in top of the Paleolithic European Cro-Magnons. Rossano say that hugging was employed by the apes a reconciliation gesture. In cases like this, hugging was utilized by the primate family as a gesture of reconciliation and repairing broken human relationships. The notion has advanced over time as hugging can be used to show love, greeting and a feeling of appreciation in the 21st century.
In the 21st century, hugging has become a normal gesture that is performed in public areas. People between your opposite sexes tend to hug in public as a gesture of a friendly relationship. Because of this, hugging has transformed from a gesture of reconciliation and gained a number of meanings (Cohen et. al, 2015). In today’s social setup, people of contrary sexes depict diverse so this means from the function of hugging. Lovers may hug to portray love, reconciliation following a home misunderstanding and the lifestyle of love in their marriage. However, hugging has lost its ritualistic interpretation in the current contemporary society (Field et. al, 2010). This aspect has led to a variety of critics from the moral point of view. Hugging between folks of opposite sex is fixed in a variety of companies as staff gets different perception of the take action. Webster says that in the current social set up, people tend to be afraid of hugging in official surroundings such as at the job place because of the proven fact that the action might be perceived as sexual. Webster reveals an moral norm as in some setting, hugging is viewed as a sexual gesture rather than indication of reconciliation, brotherhood or companionship (Hunter & Struve, 1998). This notion has resulted in the intro of reformed setting of hugging known as the ‘A-frame’ to be able to present a clear picture of people involved in the function. The ‘A-frame’ hug includes the contact of the upper body of the people who are hugging. The ‘A-frame’ hug is employed to create quality of individuals who take part in the act. ‘A-frame’ hugs are used mostly in an operating environment as it portrays ethical morals at the job (Hunter & Struve, 1998). The brand new way of hugging has played a key role in preserving the moral theory at workplace. Inside the south Parts of asia like the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, folks from complete opposite sexes are requiring to maintain self-control at the job. This notion means that hugs can even be considered unethical depending on way it is performed.
Hugs present merged perceptions on the partnership between folks who are engaged in the close body contact action. Managing the take action of hugging may lead to limiting the mental conscience of men and women who are fond of the act. In this case, people out to learn about the ethical idea of hug I order to get a clear message offered by act.
Cohen, S. , Janicki-Deverts, D. , Turner, R. B. , & Doyle, W. J. (2015). Will Hugging Provide Stress-Buffering Public Support? A REPORT of Susceptibility to Top Respiratory Infections and Illness. Psychological Technology, 26(2): 135-147.
Fairhurst, M. T. , L¶ken, L. , & Grossmann, T. (2014). Physiological and behavioral replies reveal 9-month-old newborns’ sensitivity to pleasurable touch. Psychological Science, 25(5): 1124-1131.
Field, T. (2010). Touch for socio-emotional and physical well-being: A review. Developmental Review, 30(4), 367-383.
Hunter M & Struve J. (1998). The Moral Use of Touch in Psychotherapy: The Honest Usage of Touch in Psychotherapy. NY: SAGE
Rossano, M. J. (2009). Ritual Behaviour and the Origins of Modern Cognition. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19(2): 243-56.