Reading:
Comp 1 Research Paper Essay
Share: Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest
Free Essay
Nov 19th, 2019

Comp 1 Research Paper Essay

1

81037

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Comp 1 Research Paper Essay
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

A Children’s Toy in an Adult World

Since the beginning of time, humans have continuously looked for new ways of getting

from point A to point B quickly and at a relatively low cost. Over the past decade, the desire for

fast, cheap, and reliable modes of public transportation has grown significantly. The investments

made in public transportation have created and built new services around the country. The cities

that have made these investments are reaping the benefits of ridership and economic growth.

As

technology advances, the public transportation industry is booming with new ideas and

innovations that are changing the way humans live their lives. These technologies provide

citizens with easily accessible and cost-effective means of getting around. However, some of

these new innovations which have come in the form of an electric scooter, pose many dangers to

the health and safety of the rider as well as those around them. While these scooters provide

quick and easy transportation, the dangers they present can most easily be seen in an increasingly

popular form of transportation, the Bird electric scooter.

The year 1886 is rarely talked about, yet it is one of the most symbolic, and revolutionary

periods of time in the modern world: the genesis of the present-day automobile. It was in this

year that German inventor, Karl Benz patented his Benz-Patent-Motorwagen, making cars

widely accessible in the early twentieth century. It was over twenty years after the automobile’s

inception into the lives of thousands that the technology became readily available to the masses.

In 1908, American inventor Henry Ford wanted to build a car for the multitudes. He

wanted it to be large enough for the family, but small enough for the individual to run and care

2

for. Ford claimed it would be constructed of only the finest materials, by the best men to be

hired, and after the simplest designs that modern engineering could devise. His main objective is

still a factor that holds true with today’s inventors. It was to be so low in price that no man

making a good salary would be unable to own one, and enjoy with his family the blessing of the

embodiment of the independence and freedoms associated that founded this great country. Ford’s

Model T, generally regarded as the first affordable automobile, was the car that opened travel to

the common middle-class American.

Along with the car came the development of the assembly line which eliminated

individual handcrafting. By mechanically moving the parts to the assembly work and moving the

semi-finished assembly from workstation to workstation, a finished product can be assembled

faster and with less labor than by having workers carry parts to a stationary piece for assembly.

This changed the way that many of the products that are used today were created. It made mass

production possible and made those products cost-effective so that anyone could afford them

without the worry of going broke.

For roughly two hundred years, “getting around was an arduous and exhausting

experience for Americans due to poor road conditions and inadequate modes of transportation”

(Krotova). As growing demands met with the minds of brilliant creators, many different methods

of transportation have become available for use. Some have faded away with time and new

creations. Others have proven to be ahead of their time and are still used today. History has seen

the use of horse-drawn carriages, trains, bicycles, the steam and electric powered vehicle, and

most recently the gas powered car. With these staples of modern transportation, one can only

3

wonder what is to come for the future of innovations in public transport. That innovation has

arrived in the form of a three foot tall, two-wheeled, battery operated scooter.

While manually operated push scooters have been available since the early 1990s, only

recently in late 2017 did the more mature, rechargeable, battery-powered, older brother come

onto the main stage. The introduction of the Bird scooter has been one of immense criticism and

praise as the product as well as the company has created new obstacles in cities across the United

States that are forcing individuals to change the way they live their lives. Inspired by the

enormous success of startups like Uber and Lyft, car-based ride-sharing companies that have

boomed in popularity since their introduction, a former executive at both companies, Travis

Vanderzanden created the Bird scooter. These scooters have a brief and growing history

throughout the country.

Bird is a dockless, rechargeable scooter-share company based in Santa Monica,

California. It operates electric scooters in cities throughout North America, at a cost of one dollar

to rent, plus fifteen to twenty cents per every minute the scooter is in use. Weighing nearly

twenty-five pounds, the scooters can move at speeds topping out at fifteen miles per hour and

can travel roughly fifteen miles before needing to be charged. During the first year of the young

company’s existence, it has faced vast criticism. The company seems to sweep this under the rug

due to its claimed value of $2 billion dollars.

Bird has done many things in order to ensure maximum profits while ignoring many

apparent dangers and malpractices. For example, by avoiding the use of employees needed to

charge the scooters, the company has placed their charging needs in the hands of gig workers.

Bird scooters are charged by contractual workers who sign up on Bird’s website to be

4

“chargers.” After they are approved, the company sends them all necessary charging equipment

and pays the chargers between three to twenty dollars to charge the scooters overnight, then

place them at designated “nests” throughout the service area in the morning. With the number of

scooters that need to be picked up charging can become competitive. Chargers use vans to pick

up scooters all over the city. Given the widely distributed nature of the scooter, this kind of

charging system is essential to making the economics of the system work. Bird exploits the gig

workers since it passes many of the expenses that are usually handled by companies onto the

workers, such as taxes, benefits (or lack of), and expenses for wear and tear on vehicles. This

makes the earnings for the time spent working less than minimum wage for some chargers,

especially when more new people start competing for the same number of scooters in a given

area. In some areas, competition between rival chargers has resulted in violence.

The controversies that surround the company are not hard to find and have been cited in

many cities across the country. Bird tends to enter new communities without first informing

municipal and other local authorities of their intent to start operations in their jurisdiction. This

does not allow the local regulatory agencies enough time to formulate new rules that would

properly protect all of their residents without hindering the new service. In many of those new

cities, Bird has been levied fines for operating a business without a license, failure to follow

various business zoning laws, and for allowing parked scooters to accumulate outside of the

designated area in such a way that would block sidewalks.

Many of the rules that the company put into place are often flouted by many scooter

riders. Birds safety protocol is available on the company’s website under the safety tab. The set

of rules listed consist of where to ride, where to park, the rules of the road, use of caution, and

5

more specifically how to find, operate, and ride the scooter. While Bird does a good job of listing

all of the possible ways to ensure the ride will be as safe as possible, the inevitable always

happens. This is where the term “rules are made for breaking” comes most readily to mind. The

Bird business model is supported by the absolutely transparent fiction that people will abide by

the rules. Few riders wear helmets, which are required by the company and state legislatures in

some instances. Helmets are even available for purchase from the company’s website. Lots of

people ride double, even with small children onboard which is forbidden. People ditch the

scooters on sidewalks, creating hazards for pedestrians. The user is also supposed to be at least

eighteen years of age with a valid driver’s license in order to ride a Bird, a requirement that is

frequently disregarded.

When health and safety are on the line, it is crucial that one company’s new product

doesn’t infringe on your right to move freely in public spaces without the fear of serious injury,

or even death. The company makes it clear that you are on your own if you crash into the

pavement or even an oncoming SUV while riding Bird’s scooter. By renting a Bird you are

agreeing to “fully release, indemnify, and hold harmless” (Bird) the company for injury, death,

and property damage among other losses. Robin Abcarian, a reporter for the ?Los Angeles Times,

reported in the paper’s July 6, 2018 issue that a “Westside tech entrepreneur and her

seven-year-old son were walking on a sidewalk at UCLA when a Bird rider crashed into her at

full speed, briefly knocking her unconscious. Her doctor likened the force of impact to being

tackled by a football player” (Abcarian). The woman, who chose not to have her name

mentioned in the article, was contemplating suing Bird. After contacting both her health and auto

6

insurance, neither of the two were willing to cover the costs of the damages done. The woman

was left to find out the bitter truth of the company’s release statement.

Some scooter riders have chosen to ride on the sidewalks due to their sense of

vulnerability in sharing the roads with cars and other vehicles. On the companies website, it

instructs riders to take to the streets and ride the scooters in the designated bike lane. Claiming

that by allowing the scooters to intertwine with the rest of traffic, there will be no issue of build

up on the sidewalks. Bird tells its riders to follow the laws of whatever cities are providing the

scooters. The problem is that riders don’t always follow the rules and the company is well aware

of this. The company’s business model instructs the riders to discard their spent scooters along

sidewalks and roadways, which in turn does the opposite of their intentions. This blocks the

public use of sidewalks and streets leading to congestion and an increased risk of accidents

involving riders and pedestrians.

Out of all the fallacies associated with the company, there is one thing that holds true.

Despite the dangers and all of the negative occurrences with the product, the company will

remain to stay in business. The skeptics say that these electronic scooter startups are annoying

and wildly overvalued. The optimists say these scooters are super fun and are liable to change

public transportation for the better. The issue with these scooter startups is that the companies

tend to reel in huge amounts of cash before attaining a clear view on how the economics will

work and where it can operate. All of the problems that these electric scooters face in cities still

need to be solved.

Even though it is a relatively young company, and has already been banned in several

cities and states across the country, Bird scooters are sought after by investors. “Investors

7

bidding up scooter prices are motivated not by fundamentals but by a fear of missing out”

(Levy). Venture capitalists are also betting that this fledgling market will grow rapidly as people

working downtown and attending college on big campuses recognize a new affordable and

efficient way to get around. However, some investors are hesitant to pour money into these

companies with the fear that they might become the next Segway, another technology that was

intended to revolutionize human transit but fell far short of expectations. While the public and

some investors remain wary of the possible dangers and issues associated with these scooter

companies, the company heads are cashing in on their big ideas. Following the business models

of former startups like Uber, which is now worth $62 billion dollars, these CEOs aim to do the

same with each company. Providing set “rules” and regulations to give their product a sense of

safety during use, the main goal, in the end, is money.

While these scooters have very quickly developed a dark reputation, when operated

properly, they have proven to be very useful and economically attainable for nearly anyone in

need of a quick and affordable way to commute short distances. The original intention for the

product was to eliminate the last mile of one’s commute to work. After taking another form of

transportation whether it be a personal vehicle or public transport of any sort, the scooters serve

their intended purpose in getting each individual from drop off to check-in, as quickly as

possible.

The introduction of the electric scooter as a common mode of public transportation brings

many changes to the way society is organized as well as operated. By bypassing the use of

employees, Bird has opened new doors in the minds of entrepreneurs everywhere. However, this

might prove dangerous if the “hired” workers are not subject to testing and background checks,

8

like any other job would do. The scooters are effectively changing how individuals commute as a

whole. “With the download of an app, the snap of a QR code, and a few quick pushes to get

rolling, the scooters can zoom up to 15 mph to any destination of your choice” (Skahill). Now

rather than walking your last mile to work, an appointment, or even shopping, these scooters

offer a budget efficient and fast alternative to using one’s own two legs.

In a world of endless movement, primarily dominated by cars, it is imperative that these

companies consider the necessary steps in order to implement the electric scooter into society

providing safe and quick transportation. Through new ideas and innovations, the public

transportation industry has experienced many changes. Providing citizens with easily accessible

and cost-effective means of transportation. Despite the positive changes in the modes of

transportation that have been created with Bird scooters, there are many underlying negative

personal and public safety issues associated with these changes. As these technologies become

more and more accessible for all, innovators and lawmakers alike aim to implement a set list of

laws in order to control the safety of the user and the passerby.

9

Works Cited

Abcarian, Robin. “Bird scooters – so much fun, so damn dangerous.” ?Los Angeles Times, ?LA

Times, 6 Jul. 2018,

Accessed 10 Nov. 2018.

Bird. “Safety first.” ?Bird ?, Bird, 2018, Accessed 10 Nov. 2018

Krotova, Elena. “Transportation in the United States – A Brief History.” ?Corsia, ? Corsia

Logistics,

Accessed, 10

Nov. 2018.

Levy, Ari. “Investors explain why they’re racing to get into scooter companies like Lime and

Bird, driving valuations into the billions.” ?Tech ?, CNBC, 14 Jun. 2018,

ve.html. Accessed 10 Nov. 2018.

Marshall, Arian. “Not Just Tech Bros: E-Scooter Fans Are Surprisingly Diverse.” ?Wired, ?Wired,

24 Jul. 2018,

Skahill, Madi. “Breaking down the benefits of Bird scooters.” ?VOX, ?VOX Magazine, 1 Sep.

2018,

8-8e54-13d11452c45d.html. Accessed, 10 Nov. 2018.

10

Recommended stories

GROUP AUDIT Essay

SECOND SEMESTER A182 2018/2019AUDITING AND ASSURANCE 1BKAA2013GROUP CCASE STUDY : Enron Corporation and Anderson, LLPAnalyzing the Fall of Two GiantsPrepared […]