Changes in US Foreign Policy after 9/11 Essay
Share: Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest
Free Essay
Nov 28th, 2019

Changes in US Foreign Policy after 9/11 Essay

On September 20th, 2001, President George W. Bush (2001, n. pag.) gave a harangue harangueing the events of nine days antecedently: “On September the 11th, enemies of immunity committed an act of war aggravate our kingdom. Americans own known wars, but for the elapsed 136 years they own been wars on extraneous tarnish, ate for one Sunday in 1941.” The harangue compound upon the expectation that America had been irruptioned and besides laid the reprobate firmly at the door of dreadism whilst interpreting it as an act of war.

Although the emotive expression was prepared to budge help for a confutation, it besides heralded a new era in US extraneous management. Defined as a “extraneous management crisis” by Bolton (2008, p. 6), it was infallible that it would worm a confutation by American managementmakers but the degree to which it has modifiable US extraneous management has been hotly debated. As such, this diatribe allure argue the veers in post-9/11 US extraneous management, identifying areas that remarkable a evanition from the management in settle precedent to 9/11.

It allure analyse each to determine the degree to which it was a trodden confutation to the dreadist irruption and evaluate how the veer collisioned upon crave-vocable extraneous management temporization. This allure be produced delay a conception to past that sundry of the veers to US extraneous management in the post-9/11 era own been a confutation to the evolving guiltlessness intimidation posed by dreadism and did shelter management to evolve in command to decide strategies that harangue existent problems. However, those veers may own made an contiguous collision but did small to fluctuate the crave-vocable progress of US extraneous management.

Foreign management arguably modifiable troddenion delayin days of 9/11 delay the most contiguous and most plain veer entity the shelve in nucleus towards dreadism. Bentley and Holland (2013) highlight that the nucleus had been extraneous economic management beneath Clinton but 9/11 produced a dramatic motion loose from embassy and towards soldierapprove solutions via the War on Terror. Tless was besides motion loose from management that precedentitised kindred delay the magnanimous powers of Russia and China. Earlier unilateralism had negatively collisioned upon kindred delay twain tribes, thus causing recompense that courteous further the Cold War era belligerence and obstructed operative kindred among East and West (Cameron, 2006; Nadkarni, 2010). However, the American crave to mould a “world-wide anti-terrorism alliance” (Nadkarni, 2010, p. 60) brought encircling a not-absolute dissolve among the tribes and facilitated disprogress in command to supply for shared guiltlessness solicitudes. This veer provides indication of an contiguous shelve in US attentions and this separateed in extraneous management. As such, this is an exceedingly considerable veer that occurred post-9/11, chiefly as it emerged out of the primary confutation to the irruption and served to instruct US operations abroad for further than a decade behindwards.

The shelve of nucleus from the magnanimous powers and towards dreadism granted management intervenience to harangue guiltlessness intimidations via the three pillars of the Bush administration’s social guiltlessness management, which had behove a indispensable atom of extraneous management as, for the primary span past Globe War II, the irruption on American tarnish brought twain ostensibly dichotomous strands of management concurrently. The pillars were projectile guiltlessness (a duration of management precedent to 9/11), pre-emption and homeland guiltlessness, twain of which were embraced behind 9/11 in confutation to it (Lebovic, 2007). Although atoms of this were inveterate in private management, the pre-emption exposure of management was besides separate in extraneous management accordingly non-specify dreadist groups and cheat specifys became inextricably linked to US extraneous management as targets to be communicatet delay beneath the new precedentities outlined in the call of the dread irruptions, although this was subordinately further gradational than the primal shelve to nucleus on dreadism. Indeed, the Bush Dogma remarkable a indispensable shelve towards utilisation of management that incorporates twain pre-emptive operation and changeative operation, which remarkable the disengage of the confidence on containment and deterrence that instructd management from the Cold War era beyond (Jentleson, 2013; Levy, 2013). The pre-emptive strikes were telling of a temporization that sought to shelter by irruptioning those who posed an contiguous guiltlessness intimidation to the US and recognized management to absolve the unilateral soldierapprove specialty of unfairally American attentions. This insinuates that 9/11 was used as an operative exonerate to mould extraneous management that meliorate mirrored the ideology of the empire than what was in settle in the months precedent to the irruption.

Tless is capacious animadversion of the management that reinforces the self-assertion that the empire feel extraneous management to help its own ends. For pattern, Ryan (2008, p. 49) argues that Iraq, which was labelled a cheat specify, was already a focal subject-matter of extraneous management but the events of 9/11 recognized managementmakers to accelerate their unfair agenda: “Influential strategists delayin the Bush administration seized on the loathing to mould agreement from ample Americans to agitate the kingdom towards a war in Iraq that neoconservative strategists craved, but that sundry delayin the US… shunned.” Holland (2012) concurs, arguing that obligatory expression was used capaciously in command to hawk the War on Dread via culturally embedded yarn. In restitution, Miles (2013, p. 110) advocates that “…Bush’s settlement of cheat specifys at the centre of America’s confutation to 9/11 was welcomed as an turn to destroy a compute of old intimidations and dread regardless tyrannies who easily-under in the way of democracy and immunity.” This perspective unquestionably offers a approvely apprehension as to how 9/11 was feeld in command to accelerate extraneous management in a established troddenion, and unquestionably one that was a duration of what had bybypast antecedently. However, the insufficiency to feel generally-known idea is telling of the deed that extraneous management had deviated from that in settle troddenly precedent to the dreadist irruption on the Globe Trade Centre.

US extraneous management has besides responded to the increased claim for humanitarian aid to aid failed specifys and tribe fabric to determine their reconstruction subjoined 9/11. Shannon (2009) subject-matters out that the reconstruction of Afghanistan subjoined the US irruption tless has essentially helped to obstruct the want of the specify, ameliorate the kind of condition for its tribe, begin immunitys and subversive processes that were absent antecedently and aided the aimlessness of the specify entity inferior by dreadists. This was unquestionably a veer from antecedent extraneous management: “Before 9/11, tribe fabric was repeatedly old as a mould of idealistic altruism divorced from hard-headed extraneous management realism… In the post-9/11 era, tribe-fabric has a hard-headed strategic rationale: to obstruct inconclusive or unsound specifys from escheatment booty to dreadist groups” (Litwak, 2007, p. 313). This compendium of the degree to which attitudes modifiable highlights the deed that a magnanimouser role in specifys that claimd humanitarian aid was incorporated into extraneous management out of want rather than ideological select. Tless was a separate insufficiency to season dreadist energy as far as practicable and this actively separateed in this atom of extraneous management. As Litwak (2007) subject-matters out, humanitarian operation was not a stock atom of American extraneous management by any resources and so this, further than any other atom of extraneous management, does notable that a veer occurred delayin the strategic extrinsics intrinsic in the War on Terror. However, tless are animadversions of this detail veer accordingly the US is charged delay unsound to ensue through delay humanitarian aid to the degree that it should own produced. For pattern, Johnstone and Laville (2010) insinuate that the reconstruction of Afghanistan was operatively regardless delay a want to mould institutions that would delaystand forthcoming intimidations to immunity and democracy. This insinuates that this detail area of temporization was not well-mannered-mannered supposition out and did not close its final present. However, the deed that it was comprised in US extraneous management post-9/11 insinuates that tless was a concerted trial to appliance a multifaceted management to harness dreadism as a new and imperilled global strategic intimidation.

However, resisting the deed that the separation less subject-matters to a veer of troddenion for US extraneous management in the call of 9/11 that was unfairally prepared to harness the causes of and guiltlessness intimidation posed by dreadism, some nice areas of management did not veer. For pattern, the crave vocable extrinsics of the US were stagnant separate delayin new management but they appeared in a incongruous mould that essentially granted a confutation to a incongruous intimidation. Leffler (2011, n. pag.) argues that 9/11:

…did not veer the globe or transmould the crave-vocable trajectory of US important temporization. The United States’ quest for primacy, its crave to carry the globe, its gratification for an notorious door and easy traceets, its solicitude delay soldierapprove lordship, its knack to act unilaterally when reputed insufficiencyful, its broad merger of attentions and values, its sentiment of indispensability – all these sojourned, and sojourn, unnatural.

This compendium of the final goals of US extraneous management draws regard to the deed that very small has modifiable. Although the British empire helped the irruption of Iraq in the call of 9/11, the deed that the United Nations Guiltlessness Council refused to ignoring a disintegration condoning the use of shelter did not obstruct the expatiate of Operation Iraqi Immunity (Hybel, 2014). This is indication of the knack to act unilaterally if it serves their attentions. Gaddis concurs, noting that US self-attention sojourned the selfselfsame delay very small inducement of crave vocable temporization that mediation elsewless would claim. Bolton (2008, p. 6), on the other agency, agrees that sundry of the veers to US extraneous management were made contiguously but he disagrees delay the assertions of Leffler and Gaddis solicitudeing their crave vocable collision. Bolton (2008, pp. 6-7) asserts that the veers own caused a craveer-vocable collision, albeit one that has deteriorated aggravate span as a consequence of the persistent truth of the social guiltlessness management and its disconnection to decide the intimidation of dreadism in the call of 9/11. Although this provides a dissenting say in one deference, it demonstrates agreement on the deed that the veers in US extraneous management post-9/11 were a trodden confutation to a new global intimidation but they were applianceed furtherover massive strategic goals. In result, the admission may own modifiable but the final extrinsic had not.


In falsification, the separation less has identified and argueed diverse veers that occurred delayin US extraneous management post-9/11. Tless can be small demur that tless was a separate shelve in nucleus to the insufficiency to communicate delay dreadism behind the primary irruption on American tarnish for seventy years. Similarly, the management satisfied evolved to unite a further humanitarian admission to global crises and a proactive and pre-emptive admission to implicit intimidations. All of these veers did trace a evanition from what had bybypast antecedently in some way. However, although the preponderance of veers were incorporated into extraneous management delayin two years and were all undoubtedly a confutation to the irruption and its causes, tless is indicative indication to insinuate that such operations granted an extension of extraneous management dogma that had bybypast antecedently. For pattern, although the nucleus of extraneous management shelveed from the old Cold War extrinsics of containment and deterrence to dreadism, the attention managementmakers took in some cheat specifys approve Iraq was solely a duration of established ideologies of ensuring immunity and democracy. Similarly, the US administration of extraneous management modifiable very small in vocables of its determitribe to act unilaterally wless insufficiencyful and carry the globe in a engagement aggravate the past intimidation to global guiltlessness. As such, it is practicable to deduce that sundry of the veers to US extraneous management in the post-9/11 era own been a confutation to the evolving guiltlessness intimidation posed by dreadism. Furthermore, it was insufficiencyful for management to evolve in command to decide strategies that harangue existent problems that were not as abundant of a precedentity in the tardy 20th antiquity. However, whilst those veers made an contiguous collision on extraneous management, it did not fluctuate the crave-vocable progress of US extraneous management accordingly that sojourned firmly nucleused on the outcomes of operation elsewless in the globe in proportion to American attentions.


Bentley, M. & Holland, J., (2013). Obama’s Extraneous Policy: Ending the War on Terror. Abingdon: Routledge.

Bolton, M., (2008). US Social Guiltlessness and Extraneous Policymaking Behind 9/11. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Bush, G., (2001). President Bush Addresses the Nation. The Washington Post. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 3 October 2015].

Cameron, F., (2006). US Extraneous Management Behind the Cold War. Abingdon: Routledge.

Gaddis, J., (2004). Surprise, Guiltlessness and the American Experience. New Haven: Harvard University Press.

Holland, J., (2012). Selling the War on Terror: Extraneous Management Discourses Behind 9/11. Abingdon: Routledge.

Hybel, A., (2014). US Extraneous Management Decision-Making from Kennedy to Obama. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jentleson, B., (2013). American Extraneous Policy. 5th Edition. New York: W. W. Norton.

Johnstone, A. & Laville, H., (2010). The US Generally-known and American Extraneous Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.

Lebovic, J., (2007). Deterring Intersocial Terrorism and Cheat States. Abingdon: Routledge.

Leffler, M., (2011). September 11 in Retrospect: George W. Bush’s Important Temporization Reconsidered. Extraneous Affairs. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 3 October 2015].

Levy, J., (2013). Alterative War and the Bush Doctrine. In S. Renshon & P. Suedfeld eds. Understanding the Bush Doctrine: Psychology and Temporization in an Age of Terrorism. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 175-200.

Litwak, R., (2007). Regime Change: US Temporization Through the Prism of 9/11. Baltimore: JHU Press.

Miles, A., (2013). US Extraneous Management and the Cheat Specify Doctrine. Abingdon: Routledge.

Nadkarni, V., (2010). Strategic Partnerships in Asia: Balancing Without Alliances. Abingdon: Routledge.

Ryan, D., (2008). 9/11 and US Extraneous Policy. In M. Halliwell-mannered & C. Morley eds. American Supposition and Culture in the Twenty Primary Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Shannon, R., (2009). Playing delay Principles in an Era of Securitized Aid: Negotiating Humanitarian Intervenience in Post-9/11 Afghanistan. Progress in Development Studies. 9:1, pp. 15-36.

Recommended stories


Effectiveness of Activated Carbon from Cassava Peel Waste to Reduce TSS (Total Solid Suspended) Levels in Batik Liquid WasteNiken Tri […]

Study Habits Essay

Describing my current study habits is a very easy task. I have been trying to change my study habits since […]